Ask most founders how they set their price and you'll hear some version of "costs plus a margin." That's accounting dressed up as pricing. Your price isn't a calculation — it's a statement. It tells the market what kind of product you are, who it's for, and what it's worth. Get the statement wrong and no spreadsheet will save you.
Pricing is one of the most powerful positioning levers you have, and founders consistently treat it as the least strategic. Here's the reframe.
Pricing is a positioning decision, not a cost calculation.
What this means:
Your price is a message. Make sure it says what you want it to say.
Cost-plus pricing — tally your costs, add a margin — feels rigorous and safe. It's neither. The problem is that what a product costs you to produce has almost nothing to do with what it's worth to the customer. Software that costs you cents to deliver might create thousands in value for the buyer; pricing it off your costs leaves enormous value (and revenue) on the table.
Worse, cost-plus pricing ignores the only thing that actually matters in pricing: the customer's perception of value. The customer doesn't know or care what it cost you to make. They care what it's worth to them. Anchoring your price to your costs rather than their value means you're answering the wrong question entirely. Costs set a floor (don't price below them long-term), but they should never be the basis for the price itself.
Before a customer ever uses your product, your price has already told them what kind of product it is:
| Price level | Signal sent |
|---|---|
| Very low | Cheap, basic, possibly low-quality |
| Mid | Mainstream, reasonable |
| Premium | High-quality, serious, for those who value it |
This signaling happens whether you intend it or not. Price too low and customers assume the product is low-value — sometimes the same product sells better at a higher price because the price itself communicates quality. Price high and you signal premium positioning, attracting customers who associate price with value and repelling bargain-hunters you may not want anyway.
The point is that your price participates in your positioning every bit as much as your branding and messaging. It's not a neutral number; it's a loud statement about where you sit in the market. This connects directly to positioning as a growth lever: price is positioning made numeric.
Founders underprice because it feels safe — lower price, easier sale, less risk of scaring customers off. In reality, underpricing is one of the most dangerous moves available:
The "safety" of a low price is an illusion that often does more damage than a high price would. Underpricing doesn't just leave money on the table; it actively miscommunicates your value and undermines the resources you need to deliver. Founders consistently underprice and almost never regret raising prices — the fear is real, but the danger runs the other way.
The alternative is value-based pricing — anchoring your price to the outcome you create for the customer, not your costs:
Value-based pricing requires understanding what your product is genuinely worth to the people who use it — which is harder than adding up costs, but it's the only approach that aligns your price with reality. Done right, your price becomes a deliberate part of your strategy rather than an accident of your cost structure.
Q: Isn't cost-plus pricing the responsible, rigorous approach? It feels rigorous but answers the wrong question — what a product costs you has little to do with what it's worth to the customer. Costs matter only as a floor you shouldn't price below long-term. The responsible approach is value-based pricing anchored to the outcome you create, with your price set deliberately as a positioning signal rather than a cost calculation.
Q: Why is underpricing risky if it makes sales easier? Because it signals low value, attracts the least loyal and most demanding customers, starves you of resources to grow, and is hard to reverse. The easier sale comes at the cost of miscommunicating your worth and undermining the business. Founders almost never regret raising prices but frequently regret pricing too low — the danger runs opposite to the intuition.
Q: How do I know what to charge? Anchor to the value you create — quantify what your product saves or earns the customer and price against that outcome, not your costs. Decide where you want to sit in the market and price to signal it. Then test upward, since most founders price too low. Your price selects your customers, so set it to attract the ones you actually want.
Pricing is positioning, not math. Cost-plus pricing answers the wrong question — what a product costs you has little to do with what it's worth to the customer — and your price signals your value before anyone uses the product. Underpricing isn't safe; it signals low value, attracts the wrong customers, and starves your business of resources.
Price on value instead: anchor to the outcome you create, position deliberately, and test upward, because you're almost certainly priced too low. Your price is a message about what your product is and what it's worth. Make sure it says what you want it to say.
One person, output that looks like five. It isn't about working more hours — it's about a kind of leverage teams rarely have.
No following, no network, no luck. Just an unglamorous system I ran for eighteen months. Here's exactly what I did.
I went from 200 to 11,000 subscribers without hiring anyone. AI didn't write my newsletter — it did everything around it.
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!