Should writers add llms.txt to their blog?
The internet runs on content, but not all of it is meant for AI. While large language models (LLMs) have transformed how we access information, the rules for AI access to your writing are still being written—often by the crawlers themselves. That’s where llms.txt comes in. It’s a simple, open standard file that sits at the root of your website, giving you control over how AI models interact with your content. For writers who care about ownership, monetization, and clarity, it’s not just an option—it’s a strategic tool. And if you’re publishing on platforms like Misar.Blog, understanding how to use it could mean the difference between your work being repurposed without credit or being respected on your terms.
Writers pour time, creativity, and expertise into their work. Yet, many don’t realize that AI crawlers can scrape their content without permission, often repurposing it in ways that dilute their voice or bypass their revenue streams. Platforms like Misar.Blog prioritize writer agency, but even the most writer-friendly environment can’t stop third-party AI bots from bypassing your site’s rules. That’s where llms.txt steps in.
Most websites have robots.txt, a file that tells search engine crawlers which pages to avoid. But LLMs don’t follow robots.txt—they scrape indiscriminately. Some AI companies honor robots.txt, but others don’t, leaving writers in a gray area. Without llms.txt, you’re essentially handing over your content to AI models with no strings attached.
This isn’t about blocking AI entirely—it’s about negotiating the terms of engagement. For writers who want to monetize their work or maintain control over its use, llms.txt is a non-negotiable tool.
Adding llms.txt to your blog is straightforward, but the devil is in the details. Here’s how to do it right.
Start by creating a plain text file named llms.txt and place it in the root directory of your website. For example:
``
https://yourblog.com/llms.txt
`
This file should follow the same format as robots.txt but with AI-specific directives.
2. Define Your Rules
The syntax is simple:
denotes a comment.
specifies the AI model or crawler.
blocks access to certain paths.
overrides previous disallows.
sets citation requirements.
Example:
`plaintext
Allow all AI models to crawl but require attribution
User-agent: *
Attribution: "Source: [Your Blog Name], [URL]"
Block a specific AI model (e.g., a known scrapes without credit)
User-agent: ScrapeBot-4000
Disallow: /
Allow summarization but block training
User-agent: SummarizeBot
Allow: /posts/
Disallow: /training-data/
`
3. Test Your File
Before deploying, validate your llms.txt using tools like:
- Google’s robots.txt Tester (for basic syntax checks).
- curl to fetch the file and confirm it’s accessible.
- Misar.Blog’s AI crawler compliance checker (if available).
4. Monitor and Update
AI crawlers evolve, and so should your llms.txt. Regularly check:
- Which bots are accessing your site (via server logs).
- Whether AI outputs are properly crediting you.
- New AI models that may need explicit rules.
Pro Tip: Combine with robots.txt
For maximum control, pair llms.txt with a robots.txt that disallows AI-focused crawlers:
`plaintext
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /
`
This double layer ensures even crawlers that ignore llms.txt are blocked by robots.txt.
Common llms.txt Use Cases for Writers
Every writer’s needs are different, but here are real-world scenarios where llms.txt shines:
Case 1: Protecting Premium Content
If you sell subscriptions or memberships, you may want to block AI crawlers from accessing paywalled content. Example:
`plaintext
User-agent: *
Disallow: /members-only/
`
Case 2: Allowing Summarization but Blocking Training
You might be fine with AI summarizing your posts for users, but you don’t want your content used to train models. Example:
`plaintext
User-agent: SummarizeBot
Allow: /posts/
Disallow: /training-data/
User-agent: *
Disallow: /training-data/
`
Case 3: Regional Restrictions
If you only want AI models from certain regions to access your content, specify:
`plaintext
User-agent: *
Allow: /posts/
Disallow: /
User-agent: EU-AI-Crawler
Allow: /posts/
`
Case 4: Attribution Requirements
For platforms like Misar.Blog that support AI integrations, you can enforce attribution in AI outputs:
`plaintext
User-agent: *
Attribution: "This response is based on content from [Your Blog Name]. Read the original: [URL]"
`
Case 5: Whitelisting Friendly AI Models
If you work with AI companies that respect your terms, you can allow them exclusively:
`plaintext
User-agent: MisarAI-Crawler
Allow: /posts/
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
``
At Misar.Blog, we built a platform where writers retain ownership of their work. But ownership isn’t just about publishing—it’s about control. That’s why we’ve integrated support for llms.txt directly into our platform.
If you’re publishing on Misar.Blog, you’re already in a writer-first ecosystem. Adding llms.txt ensures that your work isn’t just seen—it’s respected. Whether you’re monetizing through subscriptions, affiliate links, or direct donations, llms.txt gives you the leverage to say:
“Use my content—but on my terms.”
The conversation around AI and content ownership is evolving fast. Some argue for opt-in systems, where writers must explicitly allow AI training. Others push for legal frameworks, like the EU’s AI Act, which may force AI companies to respect website policies. But until those laws catch up, llms.txt is the most practical tool writers have.
The bottom line? llms.txt isn’t a silver bullet, but it’s the closest thing writers have to a seat at the table. In a world where AI crawlers can harvest your work in seconds, control isn’t optional—it’s essential. And if you’re publishing on Misar.Blog, you’re already on the right path. Now it’s time to take the next step.
One newsletter can become a month’s worth of search traffic—if you know how to repurpose it effectively. Most newsletters are written once,…
Web developers have long wrestled with a fundamental tension: how to keep users secure while maintaining seamless functionality across domai…
JWTs have become the de facto standard for securing Single Sign-On (SSO) flows because they’re stateless, self-contained, and easy to verify…
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!